Uganda has its first ever Oscar-nominated film, a documentary about political persecution and daring resistance to the Museveni regime.
Bobi Wine: The People's Presidenttells the story of musician Bobi Wine's transition from pop culture to political activist running for the presidency of Uganda against entrenched incumbent Yoweri Museveni. En route, Wine is arrested many times, brutally beaten, and effectively exiled from his homeland.
For On the Media, Brooke Gladstone has a compelling interview with Wine himself and director Moses Bwayo.
In following Bobi Wine for the film, the film crew was itself in peril. If behind the scenes was as breathtaking as Bwayo described, I can't imagine how unnerving the end product must be. Wine briefly spoke on OTM of his torture by Ugandan authorities, and it's not easy to hear, before he himself stopped and said he could not talk it about it more.
It happens that my all-time favorite documentary to date is Call Me Kuchu (2012), which deals with the detestable persecution of the LGBTQ community in Uganda. Call Me Kuchu is hard to watch, but I come away from it every time thinking it should be required viewing for humanity: a lesson in immorality, the horror that results when the great commandment of Matthew 22:39 is disregarded.
I note that it's not clear Wine himself, for all his persecution, quite gets the takeaway on the LGBTQ question. But he might have come around, and he's probably right that the Museveni regime leverages past transgressions against him.
Anyway, I am keen to see Bobi Wine, which is streaming in the United States on Hulu and Disney+, where the film is touted as "gripping." Fortunately, the film can be seen in Africa and even has been screened in Uganda. Wine told OTM that National Geographic has made the film available for streaming throughout the continent.
Shockingly, Wine told OTM that he is intent on returning to Uganda. Much as I would like to see change for Uganda—I've traveled there, and it's a magnificent country—I hope Wine takes to heart the lesson of Alexei Navalny and well considers his timing.
UPDATE, Mar. 4: I've since seen the film. Two thumbs up, and prayer for Uganda.
To suppress opposition to the ruling regime, especially since the 2009 "Green Movement," the speakers explained, the government of Iran has persecuted lawyers who dare to represent dissenters. Lawyers themselves have been imprisoned, and bar organizations have been disempowered in their regulatory oversight of the profession, Russell reported.
Judge Ridgway lauded a documentary, Nasrin(2020) (IMDb), which is available for $3 on multiple platforms. I'm adding it to my watch list (trailer below). Exemplary of Iranian lawyers' travails, Nasrin Sotoudeh, an activist and advocate for the rights of women and children in Iran and subject of the documentary, has been imprisoned multiple times, sentenced to lashes, and severely beaten. Voice of America reported Sotoudeh's most recent release from prison, on bail, in November 2023.
I note, DW also published a documentary piece on Sotoudeh, Protecting Human Rights in Iran (2023), available on YouTube.
The ABA ILS program was co-sponsored by the Middle East Committee, the International Human Rights Committee, and the Women's Interest Network. I am a member of the ABA ILS Legal Education and Specialist Certification Committee.
From our dining room table, a chocolate bunny left over from the weekend is staring me down. Two things are keeping me from biting off its smug head. First, I just got back from a run of only a couple miles, and I feel like I'm breathing through a straw.
Second, earlier today, I watched Chocolate's Heart of Darkness, a study of child labor in the chocolate supply chain. The 42-minute piece is free on YouTube, posted September 2020.
This English version is credited to German public broadcaster Deutsche Welle (DW), though the film originated with French independent documentary firm Premieres Lignes in 2019. French journalist and filmmaker Paul Moreira directed. On YouTube, Chocolate's Heart of Darkness appears as "Bitter Chocolate," which risks confusion, because that is the title of an equally disturbing but different project on the same subject: s2e05 of the Netflix documentary series, Rotten, directed by Abigail Harper and also released in 2019.
Both of these Bitter works update, with precious little progress to report, the sorry state of affairs captured in the 2010 documentary The Dark Side of Chocolate, which was co-directed by Danish journalist Miki Mistrati and American U. Roberto Romano, a photojournalist and human rights activist who passed away in 2013.
Cocoa I photographed in Ghana in 2020. The DW film depicts industry reliance with some success in certification tracking in Ghana, but not in Côte d'Ivoire. (RJ Peltz-Steele CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
In the last decade, I've refrained from recommending the 2010 docko to students or colleagues, because it's one of those films in which the makers' agenda so powerfully muscles in on the narrative that the viewer is left with reservations over objectivity. But now, with two more projects in the same vein and all compasses pointing in the same direction, I think it's fair to discount nuanced indications of bias and say that Big Chocolate has a real mess on its hands.
Even if the suits were to proceed in U.S. courts, or in any courts, Chocolate's Heart of Darkness gives a flavor of how hard the claims would be to prosecute. Abusive child labor is so entrenched in West African forests, and nations such as Côte d'Ivoire so utterly incapable of establishing rule of law in these remote places, that it is scarcely imaginable that cocoa could be harvested any other way. This is to say nothing of rampant deforestation to meet demand.
The film shows that the certification and tracking mechanisms set up with, let's give the benefit of the doubt, the best of intentions by the corporations to make good on sustainability pledges are so riddled with corruption as to be farcical. It strains credulity to suppose that transnational companies do not know the reality. But knowledge is not necessarily culpability. And this is hardly the only supply chain that leads from Western fancy to catastrophic human toll in the developing world.
I don't think that my chocolate bunny is going to last the week. But it's going to make me sick in more ways than one.
Of all the things one could relate about the legendary Dr. King, Nichelle Nichols (IMDb, PBS), Star Trek's original Lt. Uhura, has the very best story.
The announcement that the United States will end trade preferences for Cameroon in response to the country's human rights record marks some good news out of Washington and exemplifies the kind of "quid pro quo" that foreign policy is supposed to leverage.
In a freedom-of-expression angle to the story, documentary filmmakers screened Blacked Out: The Cameroon Internet Shutdownat RightsCon 2019 in Tunis over the summer. The presentation fit perfectly into one of the key conference themes, "#KeepItOn." I was privileged to be there and to meet one of the filmmakers, who talked about the extraordinary risk of documenting the minority anglophone community in Cameroon today. More at Quartz Africaand at the Blacked Out YouTube channel. The film can be viewed on YouTube in its 43-minute cut or its 65-minute uncut version, below.
Of interest to legal comparatists, there's an interesting underlying story in Cameroon's civil law tradition arising from a merger of French and British political possessions. That's not the subject of the movie, but you can imagine the tension of legal tradition running in tandem with tensions of culture, language, and history, and all of that overlaid on and obscuring, in classic imperialist fashion, pre- and still-existing tribal cultures and customary legal traditions.
At UMass Law School, from left to right: yours truly, sporting a Brady kit gifted by my Torts students, night class of 2018; author, commentator, and comedian Jerry Thornton, former NFL employee Scott Miller; Lemon Martini producer and UMass Law alumna Ami Clifford; and Julie Marron, acclaimed director of Happygram and Four Games in Fall.
The UMass Law School community had a special treat of an
event last week: an invitation-only, friends-and-family pre-screening of the
director’s cut of the forthcoming documentary, Four Games in Fall, from director Julie Marron and Lemon Martini
Productions.See the film’s home page and trailer here, or the trailer below.The film is in essence a documentary about
“Deflategate,” the 2015 scandal in the National Football League in which New
England Patriots Quarterback Tom Brady was accused of orchestrating the
under-inflation of footballs to rig games in his favor in the Patriots charge
to Superbowl victory.
UMass Law alumna Ami Clifford is a producer of Four Games in Fall, putting her legal
education to creative use making—as the tagline for Lemon Martini puts
it—“social justice documentaries with a twist.”Marron is an acclaimed Massachusetts director fresh off the roaring
success of her 2015 documentary about mammograms and breast cancer, Happygram.For a Q&A after the screening, Marron and
Clifford were joined by documentary interviewees: Scott Miller, a New Yorker
and former NFL employee; Jerry Thornton,
WEEI radio personality and author of From
Darkness to Dynasty: The First 40 Years of the New England Patriots; and Andrew
E. Wilson, a marketing and management professor at St. Mary’s College of
California.
Four Games in Fall
did not disappoint.Marron and Clifford
explained in the Q&A that neither one of them had more than a passing
interest in the NFL and the Patriots when they set out to make the
documentary.But they were attracted to
exactly that aspect of the Deflategate scandal: that so many people without a
vested interest in Patriots football, with nothing to gain by sticking their
necks out, seemed to be taking an interest in the case.Roughly as Clifford said it, when a lot of
very smart people in the sciences, with at best ordinary interest in American football,
started looking at the Deflategate case and the penalties exacted against
Brady, and saying “something smells here,” she and Marron started paying attention.They had no agenda, but Four Games in Fall definitely raises red flags—or, I guess, throws yellow
ones—on what seems to be NFL commissioner Roger Goodell’s hell-bent persecution
of star-athlete and national celebrity Brady and football’s Superbowl-winningest team.
Therein lies the subtle brilliance of Four Games in Fall, which takes full advantage of the documentary
format not only to examine Deflategate on its facts and merits, but to place the
affair in a critical context from social, commercial, scientific, and legal
perspectives.Reminiscent of Morgan
Spurlock’s classic Super Size Me, Four Games features Professor Wilson to
explain marketing phenomena such as “anchoring” and “confirmation bias.” Those concepts help to explain why the
conventional wisdom about what actually happened in Deflategate runs so
contrary to the facts.Following the
dollar, Marron furthermore examines the enormous market power of the NFL, which
amplifies its messaging and suppresses contrary views from the audience and the
players’ union.In this vein, the film brings
in the NFL’s reluctant engagement with the mounting evidence of CTE injury and critically exposes the "science for hire" industry.Meanwhile, science--the real stuff--reveals the startling
imprecision behind NFL rules such as ball-inflation standards.Those standards are so faulty as not to
account for on-field temperature in a sport played in late autumn and early winter.
Against this backdrop, Brady’s case winds through the
courts, where yet another story unfolds: the un-level playing field of
pervasive arbitration agreements, affecting even NFL players, and the Second
Circuit’s judicial-typical capitulation to boilerplate contract at the arguable expense of
fundamental fairness.Brady dropped his
case before trying to press on to the U.S. Supreme Court, disappointing many
observers, including, at that time, he confessed, Thornton.But
the film and the panelists explained a number of reasons why it made no sense
to continue.Brady’s mother was
diagnosed with cancer, which did not bolster the QB’s will to litigate.Yet just as importantly, Brady’s legal team
must have realized that its case, implicating NFL players and their union in opposition
to the enormous power of the NFL, was sui
generis.It did not make for the
kind of broad-implication inquiry that the Supreme Court would likely want to
see before exercising discretionary review.In truth, the many NFL players who are not stars do face physical
hardships out of proportion to their remuneration and job security, just like
an average factory Joe.At the same
time, NFL players are not Willy Loman, and the NFL is not--quite--E Corp.
Nevertheless, Deflategate, informed by Four Games in Fall, leaves a bad taste in the mouth.We do, as Americans, seek to identify
personally with our sporting heroes, however aspirational the comparison.Tom Brady’s retiring temperament (supermodel
spouse notwithstanding) and boyish charm have the feel of an underdog American
David who took on the NFL corporate Goliath and lost.Whether one agrees or not with the physical and social scientists who
populate the frames of Four Games in Fall,
it’s hard to conclude on the legal end that Brady and the Patriots got a fair
shake.And with so many of us worker
bees—tied up in arbitration contracts we did not meaningfully agree to and
don’t really want, beholden to the disproportionate and opaque oligopolistic
power of mammoth corporations for just about everything we do, including our
employment and especially lately our healthcare—Brady’s loss unexpectedly hits
home with all the punch of a 300-pound offensive tackle.
Our hero should have vanquished Goliath and failed.If Tom Brady can’t beat the monster, what
hope is there for the rest of us?
Four Games in Fall
is setting off soon for the festival circuit and will come to consumers through
one media channel or another shortly thereafter.See it.You don’t have to be a
fan of American football; I’m not.This
film is about so much more.