 |
| Teen mechanic in Philippines, 2014 (Rojessa Tiamson-Saceda, USAID, via Pixnio CC0) |
Voter information explains: "Under the proposed law, manufacturers would not be allowed to require authorization before owners or repair facilities could access mechanical data stored in a motor vehicle’s on-board diagnostic system, except through an authorization process standardized across all makes and models and administered by an entity unaffiliated with the manufacturer."
Passing this initiative should be a no-brainer. The provision is in fact only an update to an existing law that voters approved in 2012. Extending the right to repair to "telematic" data, the new law would close a right-to-repair loophole, through which carmakers can shield vehicle data against access by transmitting data out from the vehicle to a proprietary server. The only source of controversy here should be how we let corporations continuously try to exploit law and technology to evade accountability to consumers and line their pockets with monopolistic product strategies.
The initiative is opposed by the "Coalition for Safe and Secure Data." The organization's tack is that if you vote yes on Question 1, you'll facilitate domestic violence, because vehicle information can be misused by violent ne'er-do-wells. The threat is a repulsive red herring, especially considering that telematic data about consumers already are being relocated without subject sign-off. The Coalition for Safe and Secure Data is not the sheep of consumer privacy advocacy it pretends to be, but a wolf of a trade group, funded to the tune of $25m by the motor vehicle industry to shut down Question 1, according to Commonwealth Magazine.
