I had the great privilege last week to speak to the U.S. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Advisory Committee, working under the aegis of the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) in the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) on the subject of access to the private sector in the public interest.
The OPEN the Government Act of 2007 augmented FOIA to follow public records into the hands of government contractors. But the federal FOIA's reach into the private sector remains extremely limited relative to other access-to-information (ATI) systems in the United States and the world. U.S. states vary widely in approach; the vast majority of state open records acts reaches into the private sector upon some test of state delegation, whether public funding, function, or power. The same approach predominates in Europe.
The lack of such a mechanism at the federal level in the United States has resulted in a marked deficit of accountability in privatization. The problem is especially pronounced in areas in which civil rights are prone to abuse, such as privatized prison services, over which the FOIA Advisory Committee and Congress have expressed concern. By executive order, President Biden is ending the federal outsourcing of incarceration. But access policy questions remain in questions about the past, in waning contracts, and in persistent privatization in some states.
As I have written in recent years, and examined relative to ATI in the United States, Europe, and India, an emerging model of ATI in Africa advances a novel theory of private-sector access in the interest of human-rights accountability. I was privileged to share this model, and the theory behind it, with the committee. I thank the committee for its indulgence, especially OGIS Director Alina Semo for her leadership and Villanova Law Professor Tuan Samahon for his interest in my work now and in the past.
