 | |
| Not where the party was: historic Henfield House in Lynnfield, Mass. (photo by John Phelan CC BY 3.0) |
A 33-year-old father of two, Keivan B. Heath was shot and killed at a house party in Lynnfield, in northeastern Massachusetts, in the early-morning Sunday hours of Memorial Day weekend in 2016. The plaintiff in wrongful death sued party organizers and the homeowner, who had rented out the house.
According to the court opinion, drawing facts from the complaint with reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff, defendant Victor had "informed the [homeowner] that he planned to hold a college reunion party. However, he advertised a Saturday event on social media as the 'Splash Mansion Pool Party,' open to 'Special Invitation & Girls Only,' with three named disc jockeys to provide the music." More than 100 persons attended.
The property was the home of the Styller family. The property comprised "a 5,000 square foot home, a three-car garage, a 2,000 square foot patio, an in-ground heated pool, and a pool house with a fireplace and a bar on a three-acre lot in Lynnfield." Defendant Styller
rented out the premises for short periods of time using a variety of Internet platforms [including Airbnb and HomeAway (now Vrbo), according to Boston magazine]. During each rental, the [Styller family] would leave the property and stay elsewhere. In the listings, the defendant touted the property's secluded location, fenced-in yard, and electronically operated gates. He also described the property as being in one of the safest areas in Massachusetts. Renters used the house for, among other things, business retreats, conferences, "photo shoots," and reunions.
The court described the tragedy:
At approximately 3 a.m., police received two 911 calls reporting that someone at the party had been shot; one caller said that the decedent was "dying," and the other reported that people were attempting cardiopulmonary resuscitation and then said, "he's gone." Police arrived to find many vehicles leaving and people fleeing on foot. The decedent was lying alone, face up and unresponsive, near the pool. He was transported to a nearby hospital, where he was pronounced dead in the emergency room. The cause of death was two gunshot wounds to the chest.
The murder remains unsolved.
Affirming dismissal in favor of Styller, the SJC opinion is a straightforward analysis of duty in negligence. The duty of a property owner reasonably to maintain property in a safe condition does not extend generally to protect an injured from the "dangerous or unlawful acts" of third parties.
The plaintiff attempted to predicate liability on "special relationship" exceptions for foreseeable harms and for common-carrier defendants. The court rejected both theories. On foreseeability, courts have drawn exceptions in cases in which property owners knew of violent crimes on premises in the past. But plaintiffs could not sustain the allegation here. "Although the complaint cites a finding made by a Land Court judge in a related case that short-term rentals have 'significant external effects on the neighboring community and community at large,' it does not allege that short-term rentals are correlated with an increase in violent crime" (footnotes omitted).
Significantly for the short-term rental market, the court refused to analogize an Airbnb, Vrbo, etc., host to a common carrier or place of public accommodation, such as a transport provider, restaurant, or hotel, which would enhance the defendant's duty. "This comparison missed the mark," the court wrote.
Aside from the fact that there is no allegation of any relationship between the defendant and the decedent other than the fact that the decedent was shot and killed on property owned by the defendant, perhaps the biggest difference between the relationship between a business establishment and its customers and the defendant's relationship to the decedent is that the defendant had no control over the premises during the rental period.
Styller's duty as a property owner stopped with the condition of the property at the time he turned over the keys.
In a related case decided the same day, the SJC ruled against Styller in a dispute in Land Court with the town of Lynnfield.
After the Heath murder, Lynnfield amended town law expressly to ban short-term property rentals, such as Airbnbs. Lynnfield asserted that short-term rentals such as Styller's already violated the law. But ordinances, such as a prohibition on operating a "lodging or rooming house," were ambiguous on the contemporary home rental question.
The SJC disagreed with the Land Court's ruling that the short-term rental of a whole home violated the law as to rooming houses, before amendment. However, Styller wanted a ruling that his prior use was permissible, and the SJC would not go that far. In the sum of various provisions, the court held, town law "clearly and unambiguously excluded, in pertinent part, purely transient uses of property in [a residential zoning district]."
Of interest from a procedural perspective, the court ruled on the zoning case despite alleged mootness arising from Styller's sale of the property. "Unlike standing, 'mootness [is] a factor affecting [the court's] discretion, not its power,' to decide a case," the court explained.
[W]e view the viability of short-term rental use of property in the context of existing zoning regulations as one of public importance, in the sense that it raises "an important public question whose resolution will affect more persons than the parties to the case" and that "is primarily a matter of statutory [or, in this case, zoning bylaw] interpretation, not dependent on the facts of the particular case."
As well, Styller argued that the permissibility of the rental before the town amended the law remained a live issue in collateral matters of insurance coverage.
The wrongful death case is Heath-Latson v. Styller, No. SJC-12917 (June 7, 2021) (Justia). The zoning case is Styller v. Zoning Board of Appeals, No. SJC-12901 (June 7, 2021) (Justia). Chief Justice Kimberly S. Budd wrote both opinions for a unanimous court, excluding the two most recently appointed justices.
No comments:
Post a Comment