Pixabay by Aksa2011 |
Proctorio is an Arizona-based company offering online testing to academic institutions. It's similar to ExamSoft, which is used by my law school, the Massachusetts Bar, and other academic and licensing organizations.
Needless to say, businesses in the mold of Proctorio and ExamSoft have taken off since the pandemic. But these businesses are not without their problems, and their widespread use has brought unwanted scrutiny to their terms of service.
For example, the Electronic Frontier Foundation raised a red flag over ExamSoft in anticipation of its adoption to administer the California bar exam. Examsoft's terms of service afford the company overbroad reach into the computers of users and, worse, collection of biometric data from studying their faces on screen. My students have raised
legitimate concerns about ExamSoft, and I will not be administering a
"closed-book" final exam because I share those concerns.
UBC (GoToVan CC BY 2.0) |
Related privacy worries motivated University of British Columbia learning technology specialist Ian Linkletter, MLIS, to tweet out the URLs of unlisted Proctorio instructional videos located at YouTube, meaning to make his case that the company is excessively intrusive of student privacy. In response, the company sued Linkletter in British Columbia for copyright infringement and breach of confidence.
Now Linkletter has filed for dismissal under British Columbia's anti-SLAPP law. Linkletter told the Vancouver Sun that fighting the lawsuit for just "more than a month has cost him and his wife tens out thousands of dollars." Read more in Linkletter's public statement of October 16.B.C.'s anti-SLAPP law was enacted unanimously by lawmakers in March 2019. Oddly enough, B.C. lawmakers passed one of Canada's first anti-SLAPP laws in 2001, but quickly repealed it over doubts about its efficacy. I wrote recently about the dark side of anti-SLAPP laws. Never have I denied that they are sometimes deployed consistently with their laudable aims; rather, my concerns derive from their ready abuse when deployed against meritorious defamation and privacy causes.
The case is Proctorio, Inc. v. Linkletter, Vancouver Reg. No. S-208730 (filed B.C. Sup. Ct. Sept. 20, 2020) (civil claim).
Bye, bye, Bob
[UPDATE, Oct. 27, 2020. To be clear, I wrote that sub-headline before this happened: "Coal giant Robert Murray passes away just days after announcing retirement" (Stephanie Grindley, WBOY, Oct. 25, 2020).]
In other, if distantly related, anti-SLAPP news, Bob Murray is resigning and retiring as board chairman of American Consolidated Natural Resource Holdings Inc., successor of Big Coal's Murray Energy. It was a tangle with Murray that turned HBO comedian John Oliver into an anti-SLAPP champion. And, I admit again, HBO's use of anti-SLAPP law was textbook and laudable after Murray brought a groundless suit against the network.
While I disagree with Oliver over anti-SLAPP, he's one of my favorite comedians and social activists, and definitely was the mic-drop-best live act I've ever seen. Here are his key Murray Energy treatments from Last Week Tonight.
The first, June 18, 2017, drew Murray's lawsuit.
The second, November 10, 2019, followed up with a paean to anti-SLAPP, wrapping up with a musical tribute to Murray.
No comments:
Post a Comment